AG1 Pro
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
4.3 out of 5 across 2,673 verified reviews on 3 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 3 public sources (Reddit, Trustpilot, YouTube).
2,673 reviews · 4.3/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot AG1 listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
1 threads discussed · negative sentiment
Compiled from a Reddit r/nutrition listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
1 threads discussed · mixed sentiment
Compiled from a YouTube reviewer listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say (unverified)
We aggregated external reviews. We didn't check their methodology. None of them are paid placements from us, but we can't guarantee the sources themselves received no product.
AG1's Trustpilot page holds a 4.3/5 rating from 2,673 reviews. Positive reviewers report better energy, clarity, and digestive health; the negative subset centres on price relative to what greens blends actually provide.
A Reddit thread asking if anyone has tried AG1 includes a top comment stating there are no studies suggesting AG1 or similar greens blends provide a measurable benefit over a normal diet.
A dietitian's YouTube review of Athletic Greens weighs the cost against the ingredient list and lands on a mixed verdict, acknowledging some benefit from the vitamin and mineral blend but questioning whether it justifies the price over cheaper alternatives.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
-
Trustpilot aggregator4.3/52674 reviews
This is a brand-level customer-service profile for ag1; it does not isolate AG1 Pro.
verified 2026-08-07Open source → -
Reddit r/Supplements community forumnegative sentiment
Community discussion of AG1 Pro exists, with the dominant concern being limited evidence, inadequate dosing, and insufficient supplement regulation. No single Reddit thread is treated as a representative product review.
no direct URLchecked 2026-08-07
Redaktionellt notes
A creatine + HMB + zinc-carnosine upgrade bolted onto the AG1 Nästa Gen base formula, explicitly marketed at muscle-preservation for GLP-1 users and 'healthy aging', the 5g creatine dose is a legitimate research-aligned amount, but buyers are paying a $20/month premium over AG1 Nästa Gen for ingredients most could get far more cheaply as standalone creatine monohydrate.
Why this scored this way
This AG1 (Athletic Greens) AG1 Pro scores 7.2, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers the full 75.0mg trial dose of Zinc with grade A evidence (strong human trial data). At $3.30/day it's among the more expensive options in Multi/greens.
What drives the score up
- Dose-evidence score of 7.6 shows decent alignment with trial doses.
- Tested by independent lab (transparency 8.0).
- Zinc is dosed at the full research level with grade A evidence (strong human trial data).
- Creatine is dosed at the full research level with grade A evidence (strong human trial data).
- Creatine is also dosed at the full research level.
What drags it down
- Zinc (75.0mg is 500% of the 15mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
- No public analysintyg available for independent verification.
- Limited consumer feedback (community score: 6.0).
- At $3.30/day it's on the expensive side.
Why you'd choose it
- You want Zinc from a AG1 (Athletic Greens) product.
- You want a tested by independent lab product.
- You want doses that align with published research.
Why you might skip it
- You want a product with a publicly available CoA.
- You want a standard dose of zinc (this product is well above it).
- You want a cheaper option (this is $3.30/day).
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of AG1 Pro and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Multi/greens →The next highest-scoring produkter in Multi/greens, same scoring method, same rules.