Daily Longevity Blend
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
The famous red-wine molecule; longevity claims have outrun the human evidence.
Skin hydration and joint comfort at 120 mg/day.
The 'calm alertness' amino acid from green tea.
Cheap, safe, and correcting a deficiency you probably have.
Vitamin D3's essential partner, directs calcium to bones instead of arteries.
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
Consumer signals gathered from 1 platform.
Medium confidence1,352 reviews · 4.5/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot listing located during research; verified at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say (unverified)
No external reviews aggregated yet for this product.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Redaktionellt notes
Australian all-in-one powder blend combining NR (labelled as NMN-equivalent dose), pterostilbene, glycine, spermidine and 12 other longevity ingredients in a single 3g daily scoop.
Why this scored this way
This AgeMate Daily Longevity Blend scores 6.4, making it below the site average. It delivers 0.025mg of Vitamin D3 (50% of the 0.05mg trial dose) with grade A evidence (strong human trial data).
What drives the score up
- Dose-evidence score of 6.1 shows decent alignment with trial doses.
- Tested by independent lab (transparency 7.0).
- Vitamin D3 has grade A evidence and is dosed at 50% of the trial dose.
- Spermidin is dosed at the full research level with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
- Spermidin is also dosed at the full research level.
What drags it down
- Resveratrol (50mg is 10% of the 500mg trial dose) is significantly under-dosed.
- Glycine (700mg is 23% of the 3000mg trial dose) is significantly under-dosed.
- NR (500mg is 167% of the 300mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
- Spermidin (5mg is 417% of the 1.2mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
- No public analysintyg available for independent verification.
Why you'd choose it
- You want a reasonably priced longevity stack product.
- You want Vitamin D3 from a AgeMate product.
- You want a tested by independent lab product.
Why you might skip it
- You want a product with a publicly available CoA.
- You need a full trial dose of resveratrol (this product under-doses it).
- You want a standard dose of nr (this product is well above it).
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Daily Longevity Blend and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Longevity stack →The next highest-scoring produkter in Longevity stack, same scoring method, same rules.