Glycine & NAC
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
4.38 out of 5 across 310 verified reviews on 3 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 3 public sources.
301 reviews · 4.4/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from Trustpilot listing located during research; verified at build time.
9 reviews · 3.8/5 · mixed sentiment
Compiled from Amazon (via Desertcart cross-listing) listing located during research; verified at build time.
3 threads discussed · mixed sentiment
Compiled from Reddit listing located during research; verified at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say (unverified)
No external reviews aggregated yet for this product.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Redaktionellt notes
Convenient combo of the two GlyNAC components, but dosed far lower (300mg each) than the roughly 0.1g/kg-bodyweight doses used in the human GlyNAC aging-biomarker trials.
Why this scored this way
This DoNotAge Glycine & NAC scores 6.0, making it below the site average. It delivers 300.0mg of NAC (50% of the 600mg trial dose) with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
What drives the score up
- Tested by independent lab (transparency 7.0).
What drags it down
- Dose-evidence score of 5.2 is below average for the site.
- Overall dose is only 10% of the trial dose across ingredients.
- Glycine (300.0mg is 10% of the 3000mg trial dose) is significantly under-dosed.
- No public analysintyg available for independent verification.
- Limited consumer feedback (community score: 6.0).
Why you'd choose it
- You want a reasonably priced amino acid product.
- You want NAC from a DoNotAge product.
- You want a tested by independent lab product.
Why you might skip it
- You want a product with a publicly available CoA.
- You need a full trial dose of glycine (this product under-doses it).
- You want a product that hits the full trial dose (this is at 10%).
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Glycine & NAC and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Amino acid →The next highest-scoring produkter in Amino acid, same scoring method, same rules.