Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
4.4 out of 5 across 548 verified reviews on 3 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 4 public sources (Independent lab test, Reddit, Trustpilot, YouTube).
1 threads discussed · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Reddit r/longevity listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
548 reviews · 4.4/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
1 threads discussed · mixed sentiment
Compiled from a YouTube, Physionic listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
Public sources on this same product, unrelated to NO1GEVITY. NIH DSLD is the US government's registered label database (shown verbatim). SuppCo.com is a separate, unaffiliated commercial site with no partnership or data-sharing arrangement with us. NO1GEVITY scores are computed independently of both.
SuppCo is a separate, unaffiliated supplement-tracking site with no partnership, data-sharing agreement, or business relationship with NO1GEVITY. We are not endorsed by them and they do not endorse us. The two facts below are individually verified against the manufacturer or NSF; the outbound link is provided only so readers can independently cross-check on a third-party site if they want to.
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
A user paid for a certified German laboratory to assay DoNotAge's NMN capsules. Result: ~99% purity; measured NMN content slightly above the label claim.
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
Detailed ingredient walk-through. Discount code and buy link present, so the editorial score is discarded; ingredient/dose facts extracted.
Mood indicator only. We never use aggregate stars as evidence of efficacy.
Aggregate score ≈ 4.3-4.5 / 5. Mood indicator only.
Additional public mentions we located, kept separate from the deep independent reviews above.
Community praises published CoAs and non-profit model. Common concern: unauthorised Novel Food status in EU.
4.4/5 across 548 UK reviews, 4.4/5 DE (546), 4.4/5 CH (485), 4.3/5 IT (543), 4.5/5 ES (474). Strong for delivery, customer service, packaging. 88-100% negative response rate.
Reddit user sent NMN capsules to certified German lab. 1H-NMR + ICP-MS showed 98% purity, heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As, Hg) below detection limit, 555 mg actual vs 500 mg declared.
Video review notes DoNotAge is transparent but questions bioavailability of powder vs. sublingual claims.
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
Sub-lingual delivery, patented buffer, published CoA per batch. Owned by a not-for-profit foundation.
This DoNotAge Pure NMN scores 7.2, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers the full 1000mg trial dose of NMN with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive). Transparency is a clear strength (score: 9.5), with third-party testing and a public analysintyg.
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Pure NMN and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →A new human NMN trial adjusted the evidence weighting for NAD+ boosters, raising this product's overall score and category rank.
The new trial (n=120, 12-week dubbelblind) showed a statistically significant increase in whole-blood NAD+ levels at 500 mg/day NMN, with no reported adverse events. This moved the evidence grade for NMN from B to B+, which raised the dose-evidence ceiling for all NMN produkter. DoNotAge Pure NMN already met the research dose at 500 mg per portion, so its overall score climbed from 7.3 to 10.5. We now list it as Recommended in the NAD+ booster category. Buyers looking for a single-ingredient NMN at the research dose should consider this product; those wanting a multi-ingredient stack should compare with Elysium Basis or Wonderfeel Youngr.
Our scores are editorial judgments, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work. Read how we score →
The next highest-scoring produkter in NAD+ booster, same scoring method, same rules.