A user paid €315 for a certified German laboratory (Limbach GmbH, EN ISO/IEC 17025:2018 accredited) to assay DoNotAge's NMN capsules using H-NMR and ICP-MS. Result: ~98% (±2%) purity, trace niacinamide (~0.09%), heavy metals below detectable limits, ~11% overfill vs label claim.
DoNotAge® routine (15-in-1 Daily Sachet)
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
A methyl donor added to NAD+ formulas as a supporting cofactor, not a headline active.
DoNotAge's proprietary angle; genuinely interesting biology, extremely early evidence.
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
Consumer signals gathered from 3 platforms.
Low confidence, small sampleConsumer sentiment compiled from Trustpilot (brand-level) and Reddit discussions. Small sample size, treat as directional only.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say, with a source hierarchy
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Independent deep reviews, lab tests, certificates of analysis
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
Registered dietitians and physicians, without affiliate ties
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
Across 8 Trustpilot regional domains, DoNotAge holds 4.2-4.5/5 ratings with 267-548 reviews per domain. Praise centers on product quality, energy, mental clarity, sleep, and customer service. Complaints focus on delivery times, international shipping, subscription/pricing discrepancies, and one adverse-event report. No Trustpilot review specifically named the routine sachet product.
Physician YouTuber Dr. Brad Stanfield publicly criticized the Nitralis trial: (1) measured salivary nitrite, not blood NO or clinical endpoints; (2) no independent ethics board approval; (3) delivers ~60 mg actual nitrate, ~15% of RCT doses showing vascular benefit; (4) calls the '226% increase' claim 'ungrounded' and the study 'basically worthless.'
Aggregated sentiment (Trustpilot, Reddit)
Mood indicator only. We never use aggregate stars as evidence of efficacy.
Mixed brand-trust discussion across Reddit. Some threads from 2022 allege aggressive affiliate marketing and deleted critical Facebook posts. A DoNotAge Partner Manager acknowledged a problematic ad from a former marketing agency. Senaste threads (2024-2026) increasingly recommend DoNotAge alongside Renue By Science as reputable NMN brands. No dedicated Reddit thread specifically reviewing the routine sachet was found.
9+ YouTube videos specifically review the routine sachet. Nearly all are affiliate-monetized (referral/discount codes in descriptions). Coverage ranges from unboxing to one-month follow-up. Independent, non-monetized critical reviews of the sachet specifically were not found.
Community threads and aggregate ratings
Additional public mentions we located, kept separate from the deep independent reviews above.
60-day company-funded trial on 15-ingredient sachet showed 76-79% NAD+ increase and 19% reduction in perceived fatigue. Tested as finished product, not individual ingredients.
Ranked #1 longevity supplement stack by independent comparison site for formulation depth and clinical evidence. Noted as highest price at ~$203/month.
Longevity content creator reviewed entire product line, gave 4.5/5. Described brand as having good reputation for quality and trustworthiness, citing tested by independent lab ingredients with low heavy metal content.
Vår sammanfattning
Bevisning, what actually backs this product
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Claim check, vendor claims vs. our reading of the evidence
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Regelverk status
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
- Exact per-ingredient mg doses were not confirmed from an official DoNotAge supplement-facts label. The routine.donotage.org page renders its label via JavaScript/image, not extractable plaintext. All specific mg figures come from third-party review sites that claim to cite the official label.
- Vitamin D3 and magnesium exact doses within the sachet were not confirmed by any source in this research pass.
- No independent (non-DoNotAge-funded) lab testing or CoA of the finished sachet product was found. All third-party lab verification pertains to the standalone Pure NMN product, not the 15-in-1 sachet.
- The '76% NAD+ increase' marketing claim could not be verified against the primär trial data. The company's own science page reports well-being and fatigue outcomes, not NAD+ levels.
- The '$683 individual ingredient comparison price' is not independently auditable and fluctuated between $683 and $762 across page states.
- No peer-reviewed publication of the sachet's 60-day clinical trial was found. The company offers 'the full paper' as a downloadable resource but the direct paper URL was not surfaced.
- Most available sachet-specific YouTube and blog reviews are affiliate-monetized, which may bias sentiment. Independent non-affiliate critical reviews are more common for individual DoNotAge ingredients than for the sachet as a whole.
Redaktionellt notes
DoNotAge's flagship 2026 all-in-one sachet combining 15 ingredients (NMN 1,000 mg, TMG 1,000 mg, Ca-AKG 800 mg, CoQ10 200 mg, SIRT6 Activator 1,600 mg, spermidine 8 mg, resveratrol 500 mg, quercetin 400 mg, Nitralis, glycine 2,000 mg, SulforaBoost, hyaluronic acid 200 mg, D3, K2 120 mcg, magnesium) at $7.25/day. Company ran a 60-day dubbelblind placebokontrollerad trial on the finished product (n=28) showing improved well-being and reduced fatigue, but with subjective endpoints, no peer-reviewed publication, and all authors are company employees. Independent lab verification exists only for standalone NMN (98% purity, no heavy metals), not the sachet itself. Most expensive all-in-one longevity stack on the market ($203/month vs NOVOS Core $109, Blueprint $49). Omtvistad Nitralis trial and unverified '76% NAD+ increase' marketing claim. Full dossier with 15-ingredient dose analysis, clinical trial breakdown, third-party lab results, Trustpilot sentiment, competitor comparison, and data gaps available on this page.
Why this scored this way
The most ambitious all-in-one longevity stack we've scored: 15 ingredients at $7.25/day with a company-run 60-day RCT on the finished product. The score lands at 6.8 because the formulation drags it down hard: several ingredients (SIRT6 Activator, Nitralis) sit at evidence grade E with no independent human data, and the company's own trial used subjective well-being endpoints rather than aging biomarkers. Value and community scores are high, but transparency is capped at 8.0 because there is no public analysintyg for the sachet itself.
What drives the score up
- 15 ingredients in one daily sachet is the broadest longevity formulation on the market, covering NAD+ precursors, sirtuin activators, senolytics, and mitochondrial support in a single serving.
- NMN is dosed at 1,000 mg, double the 500 mg trial dose and matching the top of the human trial range.
- Spermidin at 8 mg exceeds most commercial doses and is well above the 1.2 mg used in human autophagy studies.
- The company ran a dubbelblind placebokontrollerad trial on the finished sachet (n=28), not just individual ingredients, something almost no competitor has done.
- Trustpilot ratings of 4.2-4.5/5 across 8 regional domains with 267-548 reviews each give a strong community score.
- At $3.63 per dag at studied dose, the value score is high because the sachet delivers multiple research-level doses in one product.
What drags it down
- SIRT6 Activator (1,600 mg) has evidence grade E: no independent human RCT exists. All supporting data comes from DoNotAge-funded animal research (Gorbunova lab).
- Nitralis is backed by a company-funded, company-authored pilot trial that measured salivary nitrite, not blood nitric oxide or any clinical endpoint. Dr. Brad Stanfield estimates it delivers only ~60 mg actual nitrate, about 15% of RCT doses showing vascular benefit.
- The 60-day sachet trial used subjective endpoints (WHO-5 well-being, FACIT-Fatigue) rather than objective aging biomarkers. All study authors are DoNotAge employees. No peer-reviewed publication was found.
- No public analysintyg for the finished sachet. Independent lab verification exists only for standalone NMN capsules (98% purity), not the 15-in-1 product.
- At $203/month it is the most expensive all-in-one longevity stack on the market: NOVOS Core costs $109, Blueprint $49, AgeMate $69-79.
- The widely repeated '76% NAD+ increase' marketing claim could not be verified against the company's own trial data.
- Nearly all sachet-specific YouTube reviews are affiliate-monetized, which may bias the community sentiment.
Why you'd choose it
- You want one product that covers the broadest range of longevity pathways and cannot be bothered managing 15 separate bottles.
- You value convenience over cost and are comfortable paying $203/month for a daily sachet.
- You want a product where the finished formula itself was tested in a clinical trial, even if the trial was company-funded.
- You specifically want SIRT6 Activator or Nitralis, which are proprietary to DoNotAge.
Why you might skip it
- You care about evidence quality: several ingredients have no independent human data and the company trial used subjective endpoints.
- You want a public analysintyg or third-party certification (NSF, USP) for the finished product.
- You want the best value per dollar: NOVOS Core at $109/month or Blueprint at $49/month cover similar ground at a fraction of the cost.
- You are uncomfortable with a product whose marketing claims (76% NAD+ increase, 226% nitric oxide) could not be verified against primär trial data.
- You want to control individual ingredient doses: a sachet locks you into the manufacturer's ratio whether or not it matches your needs.
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of DoNotAge® routine (15-in-1 Daily Sachet) and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Multi/greens →The next highest-scoring produkter in Multi/greens, same scoring method, same rules.