Healthline's dietitian-authored brand review concludes Double Wood is a reasonable budget option for straightforward, well-researched single ingredients, but cautions that quality perception and customer service experiences are inconsistent across its large catalog, and that the brand isn't the right fit for buyers who need premium bioavailability formats or certified-for-sport produkter.
Fisetin 500 mg
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
Consumer signals gathered from 2 platforms.
Medium confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 2 public sources (Reddit, Trustpilot).
1 threads discussed · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Reddit r/longevity listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
4.5/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say, with a source hierarchy
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Independent deep reviews, lab tests, certificates of analysis
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
Innerbody does not appear to have published a dedicated review of Double Wood's Fisetin product specifically; its general fisetin category commentary independently corroborates that ~100 mg/day is the market-standard 'daily' dose (matching Double Wood exactly) and is far below both the mouse safety ceiling and pulsed senolytic-trial doses.
Registered dietitians and physicians, without affiliate ties
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
Mixed sentiment: several reviewers praise responsive customer service, while others report dissatisfaction with specific product efficacy (e.g., complaints about an unrelated lemon balm tincture 'doing absolutely nothing').
Rates Double Wood 'qualified', above typical value-tier brand transparency norms because some SKUs (including Fisetin) have accredited finished-product potency testing, but flags that this is not universal across the catalog and the brand holds no NSF/USP certification.
Aggregated sentiment (Trustpilot, Reddit)
Mood indicator only. We never use aggregate stars as evidence of efficacy.
An individual user alleges Double Wood's third-party testing is arranged through its own contract manufacturer (reported as NRS) rather than a fully independent chain, questions the accreditation of the lab used, and claims a history of selling underdosed or substituted ingredients on some SKUs, with much of the catalog tested 'by input' rather than on the finished product.
Anecdotal single-user report from the r/Biohackers community showing real-world use of stacking many Double Wood 100 mg capsules to approximate the Mayo Clinic pulse-dose senolytic protocol, since no single-capsule high-dose Double Wood product exists.
Confirms community awareness that Double Wood's fisetin is dosed for daily chronic use (100 mg), not for the Mayo pulse protocol, and that some users switch brands specifically to get higher per-capsule doses.
Skeptical community discussion (partly in French) arguing fisetin shows no clear lifespan/healthspan benefit in some mouse contexts, pushing back on the more optimistic framing of the Yousefzadeh 2018 findings.
Community threads and aggregate ratings
Additional public mentions we located, kept separate from the deep independent reviews above.
Most-recommended budget fisetin in the community for senolytic protocols.
4.5/5. Users highlight price and CoA availability.
Vår sammanfattning
Bevisning, what actually backs this product
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Claim check, vendor claims vs. our reading of the evidence
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Regelverk status
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
- The task brief that commissioned this dossier specified a 500 mg/60-capsule Double Wood Fisetin product; no such SKU could be found anywhere (säljarens webbplats, Amazon, Target, international retail mirrors). Only a 100 mg/60-capsule SKU exists. This dossier documents the real product.
- Whether the specific ISO 17025-accredited Colmaric Analyticals COA for Fisetin (reported by suplmnt.app) is still current/available on request as of this review, or was a 2024 snapshot that may not reflect the current batch.
- Whether Double Wood's 'third-party' testing chain of custody is fully independent of its contract manufacturer, as alleged in a critical Reddit r/Supplements thread, we could not independently confirm or refute this allegation.
- Exact extraction/standardization method and purity percentage of the Cotinus coggygria stem extract used (e.g., % fisetin content in the raw extract before encapsulation), not disclosed on the label or product page.
- Whether the product is consistently in stock; as of this review the vendor page showed the product as 'Unavailable'/backordered.
- Any potential drug interaction warnings (e.g., anticoagulants such as warfarin, per a third-party retailer's label note) are not disclosed on Double Wood's own product page, only inferred from cross-referenced retailer/label copies.
Redaktionellt notes
Cheapest reputable fisetin at senolytic doses.
Why this scored this way
This is our senolytic pick by default rather than by excellence. Fisetin has evidence grade D, meaning the human data is thin and mostly extrapolated from animal models. But Double Wood delivers the 500mg senolytic dose, provides third-party testing with a public analysintyg, and at $0.50/day is the cheapest reputable fisetin on the market.
What drives the score up
- Hits the full 500mg senolytic dose used in the Mayo Clinic FISE trial protocol.
- Tested by independent lab with a public analysintyg.
- Cheapest fisetin at the trial dose on the market.
- Strong community score (9.0), though based on limited reviews.
What drags it down
- Fisetin has evidence grade D, the lowest of any ingredient on this site. Human data is extremely limited.
- Dose-evidence score of 4.0 reflects the weak evidence base, not the product quality.
- No long-term human safety data at senolytic doses.
Why you'd choose it
- You've decided to try fisetin as a senolytic and want the cheapest verified product at the trial dose.
- You understand the evidence is early-stage and accept the risk.
Why you might skip it
- You want an ingredient with strong human evidence (fisetin is grade D).
- You're looking for a daily supplement rather than an intermittent senolytic protocol.
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Fisetin 500 mg and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Senolytic →The next highest-scoring produkter in Senolytic, same scoring method, same rules.