Healthline's 2026 buyer's guide omits ProHealth Longevity entirely from its recommended list.
NMN Pro 1000
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
4.7 out of 5 across 800 verified reviews on 2 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 2 public sources (Reddit, Trustpilot).
1 threads discussed · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Reddit r/longevity listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
800 reviews · 4.7/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say, with a source hierarchy
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Independent deep reviews, lab tests, certificates of analysis
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
Registered dietitians and physicians, without affiliate ties
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
Innerbody includes ProHealth in its comparison set but ranks a competing combination product higher overall; treats ProHealth as a credible, higher-priced single-ingredient option.
An independent lab test found ProHealth's product accurately labeled, in contrast to most competitors tested.
A small-sample, below-average rating on the company's main Trustpilot page; a separate ca.trustpilot.com listing for the same domain shows a larger but still modest sample (~62-71 reviews) with a more positive sentiment summary (customers describing 'high-quality, effective' produkter and 'scientific backing and third-party testing') alongside recurring complaints about customer-service responsiveness and delivery delays.
Community threads and aggregate ratings
Additional public mentions we located, kept separate from the deep independent reviews above.
Uthever® partnership + published CoAs give it high trust in the community.
4.7/5 across ~800 reviews. Highest-rated NMN on Trustpilot.
Vår sammanfattning
Bevisning, what actually backs this product
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Claim check, vendor claims vs. our reading of the evidence
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Regelverk status
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
- No CoA specific to the finished 1000 mg NMN Pro capsule SKU (as opposed to the raw Uthever ingredient generally, or other ProHealth pack sizes) was located in this research pass.
- The specific 'decreased biological age by 12 years' marketing claim, attributed to the Huang et al. 2022 Frontiers in Aging trial, could not be confirmed in the retrieved paper abstract/summary and may be misattributed from a different Effepharm-sponsored trial on a separate product line.
- Current CEO of ProHealth Longevity could not be reconfirmed; a 2021 trade-press article names Nancy Dayton as CEO, while founder Rich Carson's LinkedIn suggests a Founder/Chairman role since late 2017 rather than day-to-day CEO.
- ConsumerLab's dedicated ProHealth page (https://www.consumerlab.com/prohealth/) could not be fetched in this pass (timeout); it is unconfirmed whether ConsumerLab has independently tested this specific product.
- Trustpilot data is inconsistent across regional/domain listings (2.5/5 with N=25 on the main .com domain vs. more positive but similarly small samples on other regional Trustpilot pages) and none reach the N>500 threshold the source-hierarchy guidance treats as a reliable independent sample size.
- EU sale/novel-food status for NMN, and whether ProHealth ships this product to EU customers under current rules, was not independently confirmed.
Redaktionellt notes
Uthever® branded NMN with published CoAs.
Why this scored this way
This ProHealth Longevity NMN Pro 1000 scores 7.1, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers the full 1000mg trial dose of NMN with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive). Transparency is a clear strength (score: 9.0), with third-party testing and a public analysintyg.
What drives the score up
- Dose-evidence score of 6.1 shows decent alignment with trial doses.
- Quality transparency of 9.0: tested by independent lab with a public analysintyg.
- Community score of 9.0 with positive consumer feedback.
- NMN is dosed at the full research level with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
What drags it down
- NMN (1000mg is 200% of the 500mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
Why you'd choose it
- You want a reasonably priced nad+ booster product.
- You want NMN from a ProHealth Longevity product.
- You prioritise tested by independent lab produkter with public lab certificates.
Why you might skip it
- You want a standard dose of nmn (this product is well above it).
- You want better value (this is $1.32/day with a value score of 8.3).
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of NMN Pro 1000 and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All NAD+ booster →The next highest-scoring produkter in NAD+ booster, same scoring method, same rules.