Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
Cheap, safe, and correcting a deficiency you probably have.
Vitamin D3's essential partner, directs calcium to bones instead of arteries.
One of the most common deficiencies; corrects sleep, muscle cramps, and blood pressure.
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
4.48 out of 5 across 5,175 verified reviews on 4 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 3 public sources.
39 reviews · 2.1/5 · negative sentiment
Compiled from Trustpilot listing located during research; verified at build time.
5,136 reviews · 4.5/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from Amazon listing located during research; verified at build time.
6 threads discussed · mixed sentiment
Compiled from Reddit listing located during research; verified at build time.
2 threads discussed · mixed sentiment
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
Public sources on this same product, unrelated to NO1GEVITY. NIH DSLD is the US government's registered label database (shown verbatim). SuppCo.com is a separate, unaffiliated commercial site with no partnership or data-sharing arrangement with us. NO1GEVITY scores are computed independently of both.
SuppCo is a separate, unaffiliated supplement-tracking site with no partnership, data-sharing agreement, or business relationship with NO1GEVITY. We are not endorsed by them and they do not endorse us. The two facts below are individually verified against the manufacturer or NSF; the outbound link is provided only so readers can independently cross-check on a third-party site if they want to.
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Marketing-quoted press, obviously fabricated aggregate ratings, or heavy-affiliate 'reviews'. Listed openly so you can see what we excluded.
First-party vendor claim about manufacturing process, not an independent test of this product's efficacy or content.
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
Community discussion exists, with the main concern being whether the potent formula requires two capsules and could add excessive zinc when combined with other supplements. No single Reddit thread is treated as a representative product review.
An Amazon listing for this exact product was located. The product URL is not retained because marketplace listings can change.
A chelated-mineral, bioavailable-form multivitamin rather than a longevity-specific formula, included here as a comparison baseline since it uses MK-4 (not MK-7) vitamin K2 and only modest magnesium/zinc doses, unlike dedicated healthy-aging multis.
This Thorne HealthTech Basic Nutrients 2/Day scores 7.4, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers the full 0.2mg trial dose of Selenium with grade A evidence (strong human trial data).
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Basic Nutrients 2/Day and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →The next highest-scoring produkter in Multi/greens, same scoring method, same rules.