Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
3.8 out of 5 across 42 verified reviews on 4 platforms.
Medium confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 4 public sources.
42 reviews · 2.4/5 · negative sentiment
Compiled from Trustpilot listing located during research; verified at build time.
positive sentiment
Compiled from Amazon listing located during research; verified at build time.
positive sentiment
Compiled from iHerb listing located during research; verified at build time.
4 threads discussed · positive sentiment
Compiled from Reddit listing located during research; verified at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
Public sources on this same product, unrelated to NO1GEVITY. NIH DSLD is the US government's registered label database (shown verbatim). SuppCo.com is a separate, unaffiliated commercial site with no partnership or data-sharing arrangement with us. NO1GEVITY scores are computed independently of both.
SuppCo is a separate, unaffiliated supplement-tracking site with no partnership, data-sharing agreement, or business relationship with NO1GEVITY. We are not endorsed by them and they do not endorse us. The two facts below are individually verified against the manufacturer or NSF; the outbound link is provided only so readers can independently cross-check on a third-party site if they want to.
No external reviews aggregated yet for this product.
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
Standard ubiquinone CoQ10 at a common 100mg dose; ubiquinol forms (e.g. competitors' Q10) generally absorb better in adults over 40, which this product does not use.
This Thorne HealthTech CoQ10 (formerly Q-Best 100) scores 6.7, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers 100.0mg of CoQ10 (50% of the 200mg trial dose) with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive). At $1.53/day it's among the more expensive options in Mitochondrial.
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of CoQ10 (formerly Q-Best 100) and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →The next highest-scoring produkter in Mitochondrial, same scoring method, same rules.