SuppCo is a separate, unaffiliated supplement-tracking site with no partnership, data-sharing agreement, or business relationship with NO1GEVITY. We are not endorsed by them and they do not endorse us. The two facts below are individually verified against the manufacturer or NSF; the outbound link is provided only so readers can independently cross-check on a third-party site if they want to.
Collagen Peptider
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Bevisning gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Säkerhet caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
Genuine benefits for skin and joint tissue at 10 g/day.
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Säkerhet flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
Quick verdict
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Bevisning grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
4.28 out of 5 across 2 verified reviews on 2 platforms.
Medium confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 2 public sources (Labdoor, Trustpilot).
4.25/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Labdoor listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time. Rating converted from 100-point to 5-point scale.
4.3/5 · positive sentiment
Compiled from a Trustpilot listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
Independent external anchors
Public sources on this same product, unrelated to NO1GEVITY. NIH DSLD is the US government's registered label database (shown verbatim). SuppCo.com is a separate, unaffiliated commercial site with no partnership or data-sharing arrangement with us. NO1GEVITY scores are computed independently of both.
What others say, with a source hierarchy
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Independent deep reviews, lab tests, certificates of analysis
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
The product's label claims match its actual lab-tested contents, and it ranks favorably on purity versus competitors, though the reviewer notes the brand itself provides no public proof behind its own third-party testing claims (docked to 4/5 on transparency specifically).
Of the tested protein/collagen powder market, this product is among the very cleanest by heavy-metal contamination, a favorable and specific finding for exactly this SKU.
A genuine, documented Prop 65 enforcement action occurred in 2017 to 2018, but it targeted a narrow set of flavored/blended produkter, not the plain Collagen Peptider, Unflavored product covered by this dossier.
Registered dietitians and physicians, without affiliate ties
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
A registered-dietitian-reviewed roundup that evaluates the product against stated criteria (ingredient quality, dose, third-party testing, taste/mixability) rather than simply repeating vendor marketing copy.
A generally balanced, disclosed-affiliate review that credits the brand's certifications while specifically criticizing the lack of public COA/testing transparency, a substantive, specific critique rather than generic marketing repackaging.
Aggregated sentiment (Trustpilot, Reddit)
Mood indicator only. We never use aggregate stars as evidence of efficacy.
Skews negative, with sampled complaints concentrated on customer service and subscription/billing issues rather than product efficacy.
Overwhelmingly positive at large scale, in sharp contrast to the Trustpilot figure above.
Community threads and aggregate ratings
Additional public mentions we located, kept separate from the deep independent reviews above.
Ranked in top-5 collagen powders for identity and purity.
4.3/5. Users like taste; note occasional shipping issues.
Vår sammanfattning
Bevisning, what actually backs this product
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Claim check, vendor claims vs. our reading of the evidence
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Regelverk status
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
- The exact geographic sourcing region for the grass-fed, pasture-raised bovine hide used in this product is not disclosed by the brand.
- Per-lot Certificates of Analysis for heavy metals/microbiological testing are not made public; the vendor states it tests every lot via independent third-party labs but does not name the lab(s) or publish results for this specific SKU.
- No RCT was found on this exact finished product (generic bovine collagen peptides at 20g/day); all supporting clinical evidence is on different branded collagen ingredients (Verisol, Peptan, CH-Alpha, ELASTEN) at lower doses (2.5 to 10g/day), so effectiveness of this specific formulation at its labeled dose is inferred, not directly demonstrated.
- Trustpilot's aggregate rating for vitalproteins.com is low (approximately 2.0/5 from 107 reviews on the US site at time of review) and sample size is below the N>500 threshold we'd want for high confidence; regional Trustpilot mirrors (UK/AU, France, Spain, Netherlands) show inconsistent ratings (roughly 2.8 to 3.1/5) with small sample sizes, and complaints skew toward customer service/subscription issues rather than product efficacy, which is a distinct signal from retailer-star-rating sites (Sam's Club shows 4.6/5 across >21,000 ratings), we could not reconcile why these two review populations diverge so sharply, and flag both rather than picking one as definitive.
- We could not locate a dedicated, methodology-disclosed Innerbody review of this specific product (Innerbody's collagen-relevant content found was a broader 'best anti-aging supplements' roundup, not a focused Vital Proteins teardown), so Innerbody could not be used as a Tier A source here despite being explicitly requested.
- The claim that a specific 2017 Proposition 65 complaint and settlement applied to 'multiple collagen produkter' is confirmed by primär court/AG documents, but we found no primär legal-database confirmation of a broader 'Vital Proteins Lawsuit 2024' alleging deceptive marketing referenced by some low-quality SEO-style sites; that claim is excluded from this dossier as unverified.
Redaktionellt notes
Bovine hydrolysate. NSF Certified.
Why this scored this way
This Vital Proteins Collagen Peptider scores 7.1, making it a mid-tier product with both strengths and weaknesses. It delivers the full 20000mg trial dose of Collagen Peptider with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
What drives the score up
- Dose-evidence score of 6.1 shows decent alignment with trial doses.
- Tested by independent lab (transparency 8.5).
- Community score of 9.0 with positive consumer feedback.
- Collagen Peptider is dosed at the full research level with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
What drags it down
- Collagen Peptider (20000mg is 200% of the 10000mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
Why you'd choose it
- You want a reasonably priced connective tissue product.
- You want Collagen Peptider from a Vital Proteins product.
- You prioritise tested by independent lab produkter with public lab certificates.
Why you might skip it
- You want a standard dose of collagen peptides (this product is well above it).
- You want better value (this is $1.07/day with a value score of 8.6).
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Collagen Peptider and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primär sources, and publish any change with a dated note in the version history above. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar produkter
All Connective tissue →The next highest-scoring produkter in Connective tissue, same scoring method, same rules.