Study

Peptide supplements and their therapeutic applications in sports medicine and orthopaedics.

see PubMed record

SCOPING REVIEW 2026

67% of the BPC-157/TB-500/CJC-1295/ipamorelin literature is animal work; human effects are modest at best and mostly uncontrolled.

DesignSCOPING REVIEW
TierTier 3, Ingredient RCT (matching dose)
Year2026
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Nsee paper
Published2026 Aug 11
Added to NO1GEVITYSep 5, 2026

PRISMA-guided scoping review of 6 peptides marketed for musculoskeletal recovery: BPC-157, thymosin beta-4 (TB-500), CJC-1295, MK-677, ipamorelin and GHK-Cu. 67% of retrieved publications used preclinical animal models, mostly rats. Human clinical studies were limited to a handful of investigations, most without robust controls. Human effect sizes were modest at best, seen only in metabolic bone health and degenerative knee pain. Dosing and routes were highly heterogeneous; no pooled effect estimate was reported. Documented class-level risks include cardiovascular complications and metabolic dysfunction including insulin resistance. The authors state these peptides should not be recommended as an adjunct to orthopaedic standard of care.

The peptides should not be recommended as an adjunct to orthopaedic standard of care.
Critic notes

Scoping review, not a meta-analysis; no pooled effect estimates. Class-level safety signals were aggregated across peptides, not individualised.

Read the source

Cited by

5 encyclopedia entries reference this study.