Study

Luteolin and glycitein from Codonopsis pilosula ameliorate age-related locomotor decline in C. elegans via DAF-16-dependent but autophagy-divergent pathways

Yan Zhuang, Lulu Yi, Can Zhang, Lu Chen, Ajia Chen, Gong Tang, Zhiling Li, Zhongliang Hu

MECHANISTIC INTERVENTION STUDY IN AGED CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS Tier 4 2026

Luteolin and glycitein improved locomotor measures in aged C. elegans through DAF-16/FOXO, with different autophagy requirements.

DesignMECHANISTIC INTERVENTION STUDY IN AGED CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS
TierTier 4, Animal or preclinical only
Year2026
JournalBiogerontology
PublishedAug 13, 2026
Added to NO1GEVITYAug 16, 2026

Yan Zhuang and colleagues tested three compounds isolated from Codonopsis pilosula in aged Caenorhabditis elegans. Luteolin and glycitein improved body-bend and thrashing frequencies. Both compounds reduced abnormalities in muscle structure and mitochondrial morphology. Both promoted nuclear translocation of DAF-16/FOXO. Knockdown of daf-16 abolished the locomotor benefit. The pathways then diverged. Luteolin required an lgg-1-dependent autophagy-related process. Glycitein improved locomotion without relying on the autophagic pathway. Alpha-spinasterol changed autophagosome levels but did not improve locomotor capacity. The PubMed record does not state N, doses, treatment duration, effect sizes, p values, or confidence intervals. The model is a nematode. The compounds were not tested in humans, and the study does not show improved lifespan or human healthspan. DAF-16 is a useful FOXO-related mechanism, but pathway activity in a nematode is not evidence that a supplement reproduces the effect in people. The result is a mechanistic lead. It does not support a clinical recommendation for luteolin, glycitein, or Codonopsis pilosula.

These findings elucidate the distinct pharmacological mechanisms of Codonopsis pilosula constituents, highlighting their potential as modulators of healthspan via DAF-16-dependent but mechanistically distinct pathways.
Critic notes

N, dose, duration, effect sizes, and statistical details are unavailable in the PubMed record. C. elegans findings require independent replication and mammalian or human validation.

Read the source